🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.